Dual systems hypothesis

It happens to the best of us. You wake up in the morning to the sound of your alarm, and convince yourself to rest for just five more minutes. Before you know it you wake up in a rush, realizing you are 20 minutes late. It seems so shocking because we normally feel that we have so much control over our choices. However, that control comes from deciding to either think intentionally or automatically about our decisions.

You can observe this if you try it yourself. The next time you have to make a decision or judgement, take a moment to think carefully and explain your reasoning explicitly. You may find that you are suddenly far more clear-headed, unlike your impulsive and sleepy self.

The psychological concept that explains this difference is the idea of automatic versus deliberate thinking, called the “dual systems hypothesis”. This is the idea that when we think we either use a deliberate and careful system, or a quick and impulsive system.

This idea is intrinsically tied to one of the most effective techniques therapists rely on: the powerful treatment for depression, anxiety, insomnia, called “Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.” One of the fundamental aspects of “CBT” is to examine automatic thoughts carefully, therefore leading your thinking towards more deliberate examination. This approach helps individuals rise out of spiraling and unwanted thoughts, lifts mood generally and makes one more effective at problem solving.

So the next time you notice you are unsatisfied with your situation, your habits get out of control, or you have a big decision to make—take a moment to breathe—and decide to think effortfully and with intention. It just might save you from hitting that oh-so-tempting snooze button.

—Tyler Swedan

Discussion Questions

How does the idea of "automatic versus deliberate thinking" explain the common experience of hitting the snooze button in the morning?

  1. How can "Cognitive Behavioral Therapy" be used to examine and redirect automatic thoughts?

  2. In what ways can thinking intentionally and deliberately improve decision making and problem solving?

  3. How can taking a moment to breathe and think with intention help individuals overcome negative thoughts and habits?

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Dr. Ken Carter
Dr. Kenneth Carter received his Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in 1993 and in 2007 finished a postdoctoral masters in clinical psychopharmacology from Farleigh Dickenson University. Before joining the faculty at Emory University, Dr. Carter served as a Senior Assistant Research Scientist in the Epidemic Intelligence Service of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention where he researched smoking as a risk marker for suicidal behaviors in adolescents. Currently he is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Oxford College of Emory University where he is actively involved in research and teaching. Dr. Carter has been a psychotherapist and researcher for over 17 years and his work has garnered awards from the National Institutes of Health, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, and the University of Michigan. In addition to research, Dr. Carter’s is actively engaged in translating research in psychology to everyday language. He has appeared in magazines such as mental_floss and Readers Digest, and well as in news programs such as Connect With Kids and NBC’s Today Show.
www.drkencarter.com
Previous
Previous

Exploring the Long-term Impact of SSRIs on Reinforcement Learning: Insights from the Escitalopram Study

Next
Next

Study Reveals the Importance of Social Support in Buffering Genetic Risk of Depression